COURT RULES AGAINST INSURANCE EXEC IN NONSOLICITATION DISPUTE

COURT RULES AGAINST INSURANCE EXEC IN NONSOLICITATION DISPUTE

COURT RULES AGAINST INSURANCE EXEC IN NONSOLICITATION DISPUTE 150 150 Dan Frith

A lawsuit involving a top Hawaii executive who resigned from an insurance company and took former clients and employees with him to a rival firm has business people talking about loyalty, relationships and professional obligations.

The case is Marsh USA Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies v. Chad W. Karasaki. Chad Karasaki, left Marsh’s Honolulu office in mid-March to become CEO of competitor, Aon Risk Service in Honolulu. The following month, Aon announced it hired four new employees, all vice presidents and senior vice presidents from Marsh’s Hawaii office. Marsh sued Karasaki, a 22-year employee, for violating a nonsolicitation agreement.

Nonsolicitation agreements can prevent departing employees from taking fellow workers to a new job or is sometimes used as a form of noncompete and prohibit the departing employee from “soliciting” his previous employers’ clients and customers.

In this case, Marsh was awarded a preliminary injunction against Karasaki that barred him from either soliciting or working on behalf of Marsh clients or potential Marsh clients, and from recruiting Marsh employees.

My Take: Negotiate these agreements on the “front-end” before you take that new job!

Share
About the author

Dan Frith

Dan Frith has over 25 years of experience representing individuals and families in cases of medical malpractice throughout Virginia. He has been named "Best Medical Malpractice Attorney" by Roanoker Magazine and is a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum. To speak with Dan, contact him by email at dfrith@frithlawfirm.com.

Back to top